STUDENTS’ COMPETENCE IN WRITING A DISCUSSION GENRE

Authors

  • Parman Hasibuan Dinas Pendidikan Pemuda dan Olahraga Kabupaten Rokan Hulu

Keywords:

Students Competence, Writing, discussion

Abstract

This research has the students’ difficulties in writing a Discussion genre as its background. Meanwhile, the draft of the2004 English curriculum suggests that the teaching of writing to senior high school students should be enhanced. This research was intended to investigate the students’ competence in writing a Discussion genre, a text type in English. This research was conducted in two phases at one senior high school in RokanHulu, Riau province. There were nine participants involved in this study. They were all from the twelfth year. This research was a qualitative case study in nature, since it dealt with a holistic description and text analysis. The procedures used tocollect data were observation, interview, and writing test.F or analysing students’ texts, Systemic functional grammar (SFG) was used as a tool. The findings revealed that the students develop their competence in writing a Discussion genre quite slowly. Their writing development started from recognizing a Discussion genre through its schematic structure,linguistic features, and metaphorical expressions. Next, they understood how to developarguments in argument stages They have used some linguistic features, such as one of the most controversial issues, the proponents of, the opponents of, in conclusion in their Discussion genre texts. This indicates that they have tried to produce coherent texts, particularly in terms of generic coherence. In terms of building internal properties of the text, one student had used good structural Themes. Finally,there was an improvement in self-confidence, as marked by the ability to produce longer texts, which averagely contain 408 words. Meanwhile in terms of weaknesses, the students still got problems dealing with grammatical patterns, cohesion, coherence, and dictions to support the clarity and effectiveness of sentences. They also had difficulties in developing arguments with convincing evidence. After looking at the findingsabove, the researcher believes that the teaching cycles as suggested in Genre-based approach are still possible to be adopted in the teaching of writing, particularly the Discussion genre. Finally, realizing that this research is far from perfect, the writer invites all concerned people to do similar research to improve the quality of the findings in this study.      

References

Alwasilah, A Chaedar. 2002. Pokoknya Kualitatif. Jakarta, Bandung: PT Kiblat Buku Utama.

Alwasilah, A. Chaedar and Alwasilah, Senny Suzanna. 2005. Pokoknya Menulis. Bandung 40264. PT Kiblat Buku Utama.

Cope, Bill and Kalantzis, Mary. 1993. The Power of Literacy: A Genre Approach to Teaching Writing. London, Washington, DC: The Falmer Press.

Christie, Frances. 2006. Genre Based Pedagogy and Systemic Functional Linguistics. Presented in National Seminar: “Zeroing in on the Genre Based-Approach” Bandung: Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.

Christie, Frances and Martin, J.R. 1997. Genre and Institution. London and New York: Continuum.

Departement Pendidikan Nasional RI. 2003. Kurikulum 2004: Standar Kompetensi. Jakarta: Depdiknas.

Eggins, Suzanne. 1994. An Introduction to Systemic Functional Linguistic. London and New York: Continuum.

Emilia, Emi. 2005. A Critical Genre-Based Approach to Teaching Academic Writing in a Tertiary EFL Context In Indonesia. Unpublished Dissertation. The University of Melbourne, Melbourne.

Feez, Susan and Joyce, Helen. 1998. Writing Skills: Narrative & Non-Fiction Text Types. Australia: Phoenix Education Pty Ltd.

Gerot and Wignel. 1994. Making Sense of Functional Grammar. Australia: Gerd Stabler, Antipodean educational Enterprises (AEE).

Hammond, Eugener R. 1989. Critical Thinking, Thoughtful Writing. (2nd). New York: McGraw Hill, Inc.

Hornby, AS. 2000. Oxford Advanced Learner’s Dictionary. UK: Oxford University Press.

Johns, Ann M (2002). Genre in the classroom: Multiple perspectives. (Ed). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publisher.

Kimberley, Nell and Cotesta, Patrizia. 1998. Student Manual: How to produce quality work and get done on time. Australia: Faculty of Business and Economics.

Martin J.R. 1992. English Texts: System and Structure. Amsterdam: John Benjamin’s Publishing Company

Merriam, Sharan B. 1998. Qualitative Research and Case Study Applications in Education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publisher.

van Lier, Leo. 1988. The Classroom and the Language Learner. London and New York: Longman Group UK Limited.

Downloads

Published

2015-12-05