MPROVING THE QUALITY OF TEACHERS’ TEACHING ADMINISRASTION PLANS THROUGH ACADEMIC SUPERVISING AT SMA IN KABUPATEN ROKAN HULU, RIAU PROVINCE

Authors

  • Parman Hasibuan Dinas Pendidikan Provinsi Riau

Keywords:

improvement, academic supervising, teachers’ teaching administrations, observation, coaching.

Abstract

The research was aimed at improving the teachers’ competence in managing their teaching administration effectively. At the beginning, it was found that majority of English teachers in SMA did not have complete the components of teaching Administration as suggested by the educational ministry regulation number 41/2007 in Kurikulum Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan (KTSP). It was because almost all English teachers did not know what they should prepare for their administration fulfillment. The research is a case study. The data collection of the study was gained through the activities of pre-observation, field notes, real observation, colleague coaching or training, and documentation. Those data were then analyzed using table of scores in the professional competence instrument. The steps taken to overcome the teachers’ teaching administration problems are among others by doing some strategies of coaching, guiding, discussing and socializing the standardized process of Indonesian National Standard of Education to English teachers. As a result of the study, from almost zero to hero, the teachers’ understanding and competences aboutteaching administration fulfillment raised, ranging from 29% to 87% (at the beginning to the end of the study). School supervisors are recommended to do similar research activities to prove the truth of the findings. For teachers, particularly English teachers, it is suggested that they change their mind set in managing their jobs. Finally, it is expected that this study will have good contribution to enhance the English teachers’ competences in managing their jobs.

References

Alwasilah, A. Chaedar. 2000. Perspektif Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris di

Indonesia. Bandung: Adira.

Brown, H. Douglas. 2001. Teaching by Principles (2nd). White Plains NY: Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.

Depdikbud. 2003. Standar kompetensi guru sekolah menengah. : Jakarta: Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Dasar Dan Menengah Direktorat

Tenaga Kependidikan.

Basuki, Wibawa. 2003. Penelitian tindakan kelas. Jakarta : Departemen Pendidikan Nasional, Direktorat Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah, Direktorat Tenaga Kependidikan.

BSNP. (2007). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Nasional Republik Indonesia Nomor 16 Tahun 2007 Tentang Standar Kualifikasi Akademik dan Kompetensi Guru. Jakarta : BSNP.

Combs. Arthur. W. 1984. The Profesional Education of Teachers. Boston: Allin and Bacon, Inc. Boston.

Depdiknas. 2007. Pedoman bantuan langsung (block grant) pelaksanaan penelitian tidakan bagi pengawas sekolah sma/smk. Jakarta: Direktoral Tenaga Kependidikan Direktoral Jendral Peningkatan Mutu Pendidikan

Dasar dan Menengah Direktorat Tenaga Kependidikan.

Depdiknas. 2005. Undang-undang republik Indonesia tentang guru dan dosen tahun 2005. Jakarta: Cemerlang Jakarta.

Depdikbud. 1994. Kelompok guru mata pelajaran pendidikan pancasila

dan kewarganegaraan. Jakarta : Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Direktorat Jendral Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah.

Kemdikbud. 2015. Panitia Penulisan “Best Practice” Pengawas. Jakarta: Subdit Program dan Evaluasi Direktorat Pembinaan PTK Pendidikan Menengah Direktorat JenderalPendidikan Menengah.

Kemdikbud. 2015. Standar Nasional Pendidikan. Standar Proses.

Jakarta: BSNP.

Mulyasa, E. DR. 2007. Menjadi Kepala Sekolah Profesional. Bandung: PT

Rosda Karya.

Kemen PAN RB. 2010. Jabatan Fungsional Pengawas Sekolah Dan Angka Kreditnya. Jakarta: Kemenpan RB.

Zepeda (2007) dalam Hamdani. 2015. Slide Modul. Diklat Calon Pengawas angkatan 26. Padang: Badan Diklat Padang Besi.

Downloads

Published

2019-06-10